Tax Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Additions under Section 2(22)(e)

The appeals and cross-objections for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10 were dismissed by the Tribunal. The deletion of additions under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act was upheld based on the commercial nature of the transactions and the tax effect falling below the prescribed limit as per Circular No.03/2018 issued by the CBDT. The Tribunal affirmed the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing that the assessee did not directly receive the funds in question.

---

---

Issues:
1. Appeal by revenue for Assessment Years 2008-09 & 2009-10 against orders of Ld. first appellate authority and cross-objections by the assessee.
2. Deletion of addition under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Applicability of deemed dividend provisions.
4. Interpretation of commercial transactions under Section 2(22)(e).
5. Validity of reassessment proceedings.
6. Tax effect of quantum additions below prescribed limit.
7. Benefit of Circular No.03/2018 issued by CBDT on monetary limits for filing appeals.

Analysis:
1. Cross Appeals for AY 2009-10: The revenue contested the deletion of addition under Section 2(22)(e) by CIT(A) regarding the loan/advance given by one entity to another, arguing it was not in the ordinary course of business. The assessee, a real estate broker, defended the advances as trade advances for land purchase. The Tribunal noted similar additions were deleted in a related firm's case, confirming commercial nature of transactions. As the assessee did not directly receive the amount in question, the appeal was dismissed.

2. Cross Appeals for AY 2008-2009: Similar to the previous year, the revenue appealed against the deletion of addition under Section 2(22)(e) by CIT(A), which was also based on commercial transaction grounds. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal considering the tax effect below the prescribed limit and the benefit of Circular No.03/2018 issued by CBDT.

3. Conclusion: Both appeals and cross-objections were dismissed based on the findings related to the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) and the tax effect falling below the prescribed limit as per the CBDT circular. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the deletion of additions, emphasizing the commercial nature of the transactions and the absence of direct receipt of funds by the assessee.

---