Discharge in disproportionate assets case upheld where separate assessed incomes and no prima facie link supported clubbing of assets.

At the discharge stage under CrPC, the court may sift the prosecution material only to see whether a prima facie case exists. In a disproportionate assets prosecution, the Madras HC held that the charge-sheet did not disclose concrete material to frame charges where the wife, mother-in-law and trust had separately assessed income-tax returns and there was no satisfactory basis to club their assets with the first accused's income or to treat them as benami holdings. The prosecution's failure to issue notice to the other accused to explain assets in their own names further weakened the case. Discharge was therefore justified.

---

---

Issues: Whether the accused were liable to be discharged under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a prosecution for disproportionate assets when the materials on record showed independent income-tax assessed incomes of the wife, mother-in-law and trust, and the prosecution had not established a prima facie link to treat those assets as belonging to the first accused.

Analysis: At the stage of consideration of discharge, the Court may sift and weigh the material only to determine whether a prima facie case exists. On the materials produced by the prosecution itself, the income of the wife, mother-in-law and the trust had been separately accounted for in income-tax returns and there was no satisfactory basis to club those amounts with the first accused's income or to treat the other accused as benamis. The prosecution had also failed to issue notice to the other accused to explain the assets standing in their own names. In these circumstances, the charge-sheet did not disclose concrete material to justify framing of charges.

Conclusion: The discharge was justified and the challenge to it failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the prosecution materials at the charge stage do not disclose a prima facie case and instead show that the disputed assets or income belong to persons having independent, separately assessed sources of income, the accused cannot be proceeded against by improperly clubbing those assets as his own.

---