Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Notice under Income Tax Act, 1961 time-barred; Court sets aside notice, disposes Writ Petition The Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was time-barred due to being served after the expiration of the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Notice under Income Tax Act, 1961 time-barred; Court sets aside notice, disposes Writ Petition
The Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was time-barred due to being served after the expiration of the limitation period. Relying on previous judgments, the Court set aside the notice and disposed of the Writ Petition accordingly. Parties were directed to comply with the digitally signed order.
Issues: Challenge to notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on the new regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 and the limitation period for issuing notices.
Analysis: The Writ Petition challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 30.06.2021, received by the petitioner on 16.07.2021, concerning Assessment Year 2013-14. The petitioner argued that the notice was not in accordance with the new regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and was barred by limitation. The petitioner relied on the Judgment of a Coordinate Bench and an order passed by the current Bench to support the claim of limitation. An order under Section 148A(d) of the Act was passed based on the impugned notice (para 1-2).
The petitioner contended that the impugned notice was served after the time period available to the revenue to issue notices under the erstwhile Section 148 of the Act had expired. The petitioner argued that the impugned notice was not valid due to being served after the deadline. The respondent, however, argued that the notice was issued on 30.06.2021 and the delay in delivery was due to a technical glitch. The Court noted that the e-mail evidence showed the notice was sent on 16.07.2021, supporting the petitioner's claim of being time-barred (para 3-5).
The Court agreed with the petitioner that the impugned notice was indeed barred by limitation, in line with previous judgments on similar matters. Consequently, the Court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, disposing of the Writ Petition accordingly (para 6-8). Parties were instructed to act based on the digitally signed copy of the order (para 9).
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
