Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a co-operative credit society providing credit facilities only to its members is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or is hit by the exclusion in section 80P(4) as a co-operative bank.
Analysis: The assessee was found to be a credit co-operative society confined to its employee-members and not engaged in banking with the public at large. The issue was covered by earlier Tribunal and jurisdictional High Court decisions holding that lending to members does not, by itself, amount to banking activity under section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The earlier view was also reinforced by the Supreme Court's affirmation of the principle that such credit societies are not co-operative banks and therefore remain eligible for deduction under section 80P(2).
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80P, and the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable.