Appeals Dismissed for Lack of Pursuit; Option for Order Recall on Valid Grounds

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging the Assessing Officer's orders in various assessment years due to the appellant's perceived lack of seriousness in pursuing them. The dismissal was based on the appellant's frequent adjournment requests, indicating a lack of commitment. The Tribunal allowed the appellant the option to seek a recall of the order if a reasonable cause for non-representation on the hearing date could be demonstrated.

---

---

Issues:
1. Correctness of orders passed by the AO under section 143(3)/14C in various assessment years.
2. Adjournment sought by the assessee's counsel.
3. Dismissal of the appeals due to lack of seriousness in pursuing them.

Issue 1: Correctness of AO's Orders
The judgment pertains to the correctness of orders passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 143(3)/14C in the assessment years 2006-07, 2008-09, and 2007-08. The appellant challenged the orders dated 21.09.2010, 31.10.2011, and 24.09.2012. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee was perceived not to be serious in pursuing the appeals. The dismissal was based on the Tribunal's observation that most adjournments were at the request of the assessee, indicating a lack of commitment. The Tribunal referred to precedents like Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd. and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT to support the decision.

Issue 2: Adjournment Request
During the hearing, an adjournment petition was submitted by the appellant's counsel citing unavailability. The Counsel was asked to provide reasons for the adjournment, but no substantial explanation was given despite a query. The Department objected to the adjournment, stating they were prepared for the hearing. The Tribunal noted that most adjournments were requested by the assessee, with few exceptions. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal inferred that the appellant was not serious about pursuing the appeals, leading to their dismissal.

Issue 3: Dismissal of Appeals
Based on the pattern of adjournments and the lack of seriousness in pursuing the appeals, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals. However, it allowed the appellant to seek a recall of the order if they could demonstrate a reasonable cause for non-representation on the hearing date. The dismissal was pronounced in open court, and the appellant was given the option to approach for a review if advised and justified.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed the correctness of the AO's orders, the adjournment sought by the appellant's counsel, and the subsequent dismissal of the appeals due to perceived lack of seriousness in pursuing them. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of commitment and provided the appellant with an opportunity to request a review if valid reasons for non-representation could be shown.

---