TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Appeal, Appellant Ordered to Surrender</h1> <h3>Maruti Nivrutti Navale Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors.</h3> The appeal for anticipatory bail was dismissed by the High Court. The Appellant was directed to surrender within two weeks to seek regular bail. The Court ... - Issues involved: The judgment involves the consideration of an application for anticipatory bail filed by the Appellant against a complaint filed under Sections 420, 465, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, along with allegations of forgery and false representation.Brief facts: The Appellant, as the Founder President of a technical education society, entered into negotiations with a charity trust for leasing and selling properties in Pune. Disputes arose regarding the lease agreements, leading to legal actions including a complaint to the police and applications under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.Contentions: The Respondents alleged that the Appellant committed forgery in lease agreements and made false representations to authorities. The State argued for custodial interrogation to seize alleged forged documents and investigate the extent of false information provided. The Complainant's Counsel emphasized the seriousness of the offenses and opposed granting relief to the Appellant.Court's analysis: The Court reviewed the documents, corrections, and communications involved in the case, noting the seriousness of the alleged offenses. Emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation to gather all relevant information, the Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts in denying anticipatory bail to the Appellant.Conclusion: The appeal for anticipatory bail was dismissed, and the Appellant was directed to surrender within two weeks to seek regular bail. The Court clarified that the decision on anticipatory bail does not affect the trial court's discretion in deciding on bail applications independently.
TaxTMI 
