Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a right of pre-emption under the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966 can be exercised again against a later sale of the same property after the pre-emptor did not assert the right in an earlier sale transaction, and whether the suit was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The right of pre-emption is a weak right and is essentially a right of substitution, not a recurring right in perpetuity. Reading Section 21 of the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966 with Article 97 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation is tied to the relevant sale transaction. Section 9 of the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966 provides for loss of the right if it is not exercised within the prescribed period after notice, and that loss is transaction-specific but also reflects waiver of the right by the person entitled to pre-empt. Once the pre-emptor has waived or not exercised the right in an earlier transaction involving the same property, the statute does not permit revival of the same right against a subsequent sale of that property.
Conclusion: The right of pre-emption was held to be exercisable only once, and the subsequent suit based on a later sale was barred by limitation; the decision was in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: A right of pre-emption under the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966 is a weak right of substitution that must be exercised when it first arises, and if it is waived or not exercised in the earlier relevant transaction, Section 9 bars its revival against a later sale of the same property.