Tribunal excludes Govt company, supports royalty payment deletion, affirms transfer pricing principles

The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of Engineers India Limited as a comparable company for transfer pricing purposes, citing operating constraints of Government companies. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the deletion of a transfer pricing adjustment on royalty payments, project engineering, and manufacturing drawings, emphasizing RBI approval of payments and lack of justification for adjustments. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both issues, affirming the importance of consistent application of transfer pricing principles and adherence to legal precedents in determining arm's length prices for international transactions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Exclusion of Engineers India Limited as a comparable company.
2. Deletion of transfer pricing adjustment on account of royalty, project engineering, and manufacturing drawings.

Analysis:
1. The first issue revolves around the exclusion of Engineers India Limited, a Government Undertaking, as a comparable company for transfer pricing purposes. The Tribunal has consistently held that Government companies are not suitable comparables due to operating constraints. The Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2008-09 supported the exclusion of Engineers India Limited based on specific reasons related to profit motive and related party transactions. The Dispute Resolution Panel also rejected the Government undertaking as comparable by following the Tribunal's order in the earlier assessment year. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging this exclusion.

2. The second issue concerns the deletion of a transfer pricing adjustment amounting to Rs.5,93,58,926 on payment of royalty, project engineering, and manufacturing drawings. The DRP deleted this adjustment based on the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal's findings highlighted the approval of royalty payments by the RBI and the lack of justification for proposing adjustments when payments were approved or deemed approved. The Tribunal found no material to distinguish the facts in the current assessment year or challenge its earlier decision. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this issue as well.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decisions of the DRP and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both issues. The cross objections filed by the assessee were also dismissed as they became infructuous following the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of consistent application of transfer pricing principles and adherence to legal precedents in determining arm's length prices for international transactions.

---