Tribunal orders restoration, deletion, and verification in compliance with legal provisions.

The Tribunal ordered the restoration of various issues for further review, deletion of certain disallowances, and directed factual verification for compliance with legal provisions. The decisions were made based on legal precedents and specific case facts, ensuring a comprehensive and just adjudication.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustments for advances to associated enterprises.
2. ALP adjustments for corporate guarantee fees.
3. ALP adjustments for interest on trading receivables.
4. ALP adjustments for sale and purchase transactions.
5. Depreciation disallowance.
6. Section 14A disallowance.
7. Disallowance of sales promotion and business marketing expenses.
8. Disallowance of Section 35(2AB) weighted deduction.
9. Adjustment of capital gains on slump sales.
10. Denial of Section 80IC deductions.
11. Treatment of subsidy amounts received as revenue items.
12. Validity of assessments for want of incriminating material.
13. Section 43B disallowance.

Detailed Analysis:

1. ALP Adjustments for Advances to Associated Enterprises:
The assessee contested the ALP adjustments made by the lower authorities, arguing that the advances to overseas Associated Enterprises (AEs) were for equity investments and not loans. The Tribunal noted that this issue had been previously restored to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for verification. The Tribunal decided to restore the matter back to the TPO for all four assessment years to verify if the advances were indeed for equity investments.

2. ALP Adjustments for Corporate Guarantee Fees:
The Tribunal considered whether corporate guarantees constituted international transactions. Citing the case of PCIT Vs. Redington (India) Limited, it was held that corporate guarantees do amount to international transactions. However, for quantification, the Tribunal deemed a lumpsum commission rate of 0.5% on the amount of corporate guarantees utilized as appropriate.

3. ALP Adjustments for Interest on Trading Receivables:
The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' stance that interest on outstanding receivables is an international transaction under Section 92B. However, it reversed the TPO's action of using SBI's short-term deposit rates for benchmarking, directing that LIBOR rates should be used instead.

4. ALP Adjustments for Sale and Purchase Transactions:
The assessee argued that the transactions should be benchmarked using combined audited results due to a merger. The Tribunal found merit in this argument and directed the TPO to consider the combined book results for benchmarking.

5. Depreciation Disallowance:
The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the consideration of closing balances of fixed assets. It directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the depreciation claims, taking into account the correct closing and opening balances.

6. Section 14A Disallowance:
The Tribunal found no exempt income in the relevant years and cited case laws to hold that Section 14A disallowance applies only in relation to exempt income. The disallowance was directed to be deleted.

7. Disallowance of Sales Promotion and Business Marketing Expenses:
The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not substantiated that the expenses were freebies to doctors. Given that the assessee dealt in special chemicals rather than finished products, the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was not sustainable and directed its deletion.

8. Disallowance of Section 35(2AB) Weighted Deduction:
The Tribunal noted that the requirement for Form 3CL and 3CM was only effective from 01.07.2016. It held that the deduction should be allowed based on the approval from DSIR and directed the Assessing Officer to verify the facts and allow the deduction accordingly.

9. Adjustment of Capital Gains on Slump Sales:
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the sales related to the outstanding receivables had already been taxed in preceding years to avoid double addition.

10. Denial of Section 80IC Deductions:
The Tribunal found that the assessee could raise a fresh claim of deduction under Chapter VI in a return filed under Section 153A, even if not claimed in the original return. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify the statutory conditions and allow the deduction.

11. Treatment of Subsidy Amounts Received as Revenue Items:
The Tribunal held that the subsidies received under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme were capital receipts, not liable to tax, and directed the deletion of the disallowance.

12. Validity of Assessments for Want of Incriminating Material:
For A.Y. 2016-17, the Tribunal quashed the assessment for lack of incriminating material found during the search, following its earlier decision for preceding years.

13. Section 43B Disallowance:
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the factual position and allow the relief as per the DRP's binding directions.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal's detailed analysis led to various issues being restored for fresh consideration, some disallowances being deleted, and directions for factual verification to ensure compliance with legal provisions. The decisions were based on legal precedents and specific facts of the case, ensuring a thorough and fair adjudication.

---