Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether filing of ARE-2 was mandatory as a condition precedent for availing duty rebate.
Analysis: The Court noted that the question was no longer res integra and that earlier Division Bench decisions of the same Court had consistently held that failure to file ARE-2 disentitled the claimant from the benefit under the rebate scheme, the requirement being a statutory condition. No reason was found to depart from that settled view.
Conclusion: Filing of ARE-2 was mandatory, and non-filing disentitled the petitioner from duty rebate. The writ petition was dismissed.