Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant's receipts by way of gifts, loans, partition share and bequest, which were contemporaneously intimated to the department and reflected in income tax returns, could be treated as part of his "known sources of income" so as to negate the charge of possession of disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Analysis: The expression "known sources of income" was understood to require not merely a lawful source but also proper intimation in accordance with the applicable law, rules or orders governing the public servant. The Court found that the amounts received by the appellant were proved by evidence, supported by contemporaneous documents, and were not shown to be bogus or part of a calculated device. The receipts were also reflected in the appellant's income tax returns. The relevant conduct rules did not create an absolute embargo on such receipts but regulated acceptance, borrowing and inherited property through reporting, sanction or permission requirements. On the facts, the amounts had been duly disclosed and should have been deducted from the alleged excess.
Conclusion: The impugned conviction could not be sustained and the appellant was entitled to acquittal.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts received from lawful sources form part of "known sources of income" for the purpose of a disproportionate assets prosecution when they are contemporaneously disclosed in the manner required by the applicable rules and supported by reliable records.