Family arrangement without transfer of specific property need not be registered, and a final partition finding bars relitigation.

A bona fide family arrangement that merely records future steps for division of joint family property does not itself create or extinguish rights in specific immovable property, so compulsory registration is not attracted. The Court also held that where an earlier final finding had already determined that the family properties were partitioned in 1964, the same parties could not reopen that issue in a later partition suit; res judicata barred the fresh claim. The dismissal of the suit and the concurrent findings below were therefore sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the partition arrangement of 1964 required compulsory registration and whether the subsequent suit for partition was barred by res judicata in view of the earlier final finding that the family properties had already been partitioned.

Analysis: The award/resolution of 1964 was examined and found to be only a family arrangement or memorandum recording the steps to be taken for division of the joint family properties in future. It did not itself create or extinguish any right in any specific immovable property, and therefore did not fall within the mischief of compulsory registration under the Registration Act. The document was treated as one falling within the exception for documents that merely create a right to obtain another document, rather than a conveyance of specific rights in property. On the second question, the earlier appellate decision had already recorded a final finding that the family properties had been partitioned in 1964, and that finding had not been challenged further. Since the same parties were seeking to reopen the same issue in a fresh suit, the bar of res judicata applied.

Conclusion: The 1964 family arrangement did not require registration, and the fresh suit for partition was barred by res judicata. The dismissal of the suit and the concurrent appellate findings were upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the respondent's defence based on the concluded earlier partition and finality of the prior adjudication was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide family arrangement that does not itself create rights in specific immovable property does not require registration, and a final finding on prior partition between the same parties cannot be reopened in a later suit for the same relief.

---