Court permits victims to challenge case, recognizing their rights in criminal proceedings.

The judge upheld the order permitting the Opposite Parties to proceed with the case and file a Naraji Application. The court ruled that the legal heirs of the deceased de-facto complainant, who were also victims of the fraud, had the right to file the Naraji Petition. Emphasizing the evolving recognition of victims' rights in criminal cases, the judge highlighted the importance of victims in the criminal justice system and found no illegality in the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order. The judge directed the Criminal Section to provide certified copies of the judgment to the parties involved.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order permitting Opposite Parties to proceed with the case and file Naraji Application.

Analysis:
1. The petitioners challenged the order allowing the Opposite Parties to proceed with the case and file a Naraji Application. The petitioners argued that only the informant has the right to file a Protest Petition, not the legal heirs. They cited relevant Supreme Court decisions to support their contention.

2. The Opposite Parties, on the other hand, defended the order, stating that they are entitled to represent their deceased mother, who was the de-facto complainant. They argued that allowing them to file the Naraji Petition was essential as they were the victims of the fraud committed by the accused. They also cited Supreme Court decisions to support their argument.

3. The State's counsel supported the Opposite Parties' right to file the Naraji Petition, emphasizing the importance of allowing victims to make submissions before the Magistrate.

4. The judge carefully considered the arguments presented by both sides and reviewed the relevant decisions cited. The judge then provided a detailed account of the facts leading to the case, highlighting the fraudulent inducement and subsequent legal actions taken by the deceased de-facto complainant and her legal heirs.

5. The judge discussed the legal concept of a "victim" introduced in the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008, emphasizing the rights and recognition granted to victims in criminal proceedings. The judge explained the significance of the victim's role in the criminal justice system and the amendments made to protect their interests.

6. Considering the legal framework and the importance of victims in criminal proceedings, the judge concluded that the legal heirs of the deceased de-facto complainant, who were also the victims, were entitled to file the Naraji Petition. The judge dismissed the Revision, finding no illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

7. The judge highlighted the evolving recognition of victims' rights in criminal cases and emphasized the victim's crucial role in various stages of the legal process. The judgment concluded by directing the Criminal Section to provide certified copies of the judgment to the parties involved.

---