Appellate Tribunal upholds treatment of PF/ESI contributions as employer income, dismisses appeal.

The Appellate Tribunal allowed the revenue's Miscellaneous Petition, upheld the treatment of employees' contributions to PF/ESI as 'income in the hands of the employer,' and accepted the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed it valid to make disallowances/additions under section 143(1)(a) of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
1. Rectification of order due to belated remittance of PF/ESI.
2. Treatment of employees' contributions to PF/ESI.
3. Disallowance under section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act.
4. Validity of disallowance under section 143(1)(a) of the Act.

Issue 1: Rectification of order due to belated remittance of PF/ESI:
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the revenue, citing a mistake in the order passed regarding belated remittance of PF/ESI, which was rectified based on the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT-1. The order passed by the bench was recalled, and the case proceeded to be heard on merits.

Issue 2: Treatment of employees' contributions to PF/ESI:
The Appellate Tribunal considered the latest decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Checkmate Services case, clarifying that Section 43B(b) does not cover employees' contributions to PF/ESI. The contributions need to be deposited within the due date as per relevant employees' welfare legislation failing which it would be treated as 'income in the hands of the employer' u/s.2(24)(x) of the Act. The order of lower authorities was to be restored based on this decision.

Issue 3: Disallowance under section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act:
In line with the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal upheld that the addition could be made for employees' contribution to PF/ESI not deposited within the stipulated date as per the respective Act. The disallowance was deemed acceptable under section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act, as the assessee had failed to deposit the employees' contribution on time.

Issue 4: Validity of disallowance under section 143(1)(a) of the Act:
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the argument that disallowance/addition cannot be made under section 143(1)(a) of the Act. Citing a similar decision by a coordinate bench and the judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court, it was held that such additions can be made under this section. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed based on these findings.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the revenue's Miscellaneous Petition, upheld the treatment of employees' contributions to PF/ESI as 'income in the hands of the employer,' and accepted the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed it valid to make disallowances/additions under section 143(1)(a) of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the assessee.

---