Dowry death presumption requires proof of cruelty soon before death linked to dowry demand, not mere general allegations.

A conviction for dowry death requires proof that the woman died otherwise than in normal circumstances within seven years of marriage and that, soon before death, she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or relatives in connection with a dowry demand. Only then does the presumption under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act arise. Here, the evidence was limited to bald assertions by two witnesses and did not reliably link any cruelty or harassment to a dowry demand. The record was therefore insufficient to invoke the statutory presumption, and the convictions under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code were held unsustainable, with the accused given the benefit of doubt.

---

---

Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code could be sustained when the prosecution evidence did not establish cruelty or harassment soon before death in connection with a demand for dowry, and whether the presumption under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act applied.

Analysis: To sustain a conviction for dowry death, the prosecution must prove that the woman died otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of marriage and that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by the husband or his relatives for, or in connection with, a demand for dowry. Only then does the statutory presumption under Section 113B arise. In the present case, the evidence consisted only of bald assertions by two witnesses and did not show reliable material linking the alleged cruelty or harassment to any dowry demand. The record also did not establish sufficient proof to invoke the presumption against the accused.

Conclusion: The conviction under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was not sustainable, and the appellants were entitled to the benefit of doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: A conviction for dowry death cannot rest on general allegations of cruelty alone; the prosecution must prove cruelty or harassment soon before death in connection with a dowry demand before the presumption under Section 113B can be invoked.

---