Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection should be granted against recovery measures under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, where the petitioner was the guarantor and the borrower had not been fully proceeded against.
Analysis: The petitioner's grievance was that the bank had not shown adequate steps taken against the principal borrower and had proceeded directly against the guarantor. In view of the material then available, the Court found it appropriate to preserve the status quo and restrain further action under the recovery provision until further orders.
Conclusion: Interim restraint against action under section 13(4) was granted in favour of the petitioner, and any existing possession was directed to be maintained pending further orders.