Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the royalty received from the Indian distributor for distribution and exhibition rights in cinematographic films was taxable in India as royalty or business income, and whether the Indian company constituted a permanent establishment of the non-resident assessee.
Analysis: The issue was covered by the Tribunal's earlier orders in the assessee's own case for preceding assessment years. The consideration received for sale, distribution or exhibition of cinematographic films fell within the statutory exclusion from royalty under section 9(1)(vi), read with Explanation 2(v), of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier finding that the Indian company was acting independently and did not constitute a dependent agent permanent establishment, so business profits of the non-resident could not be taxed in India in the absence of a PE. The same view had also been accepted under the India-US tax treaty for the earlier years.
Conclusion: The royalty was not taxable in India either as royalty or as business income, and the absence of a permanent establishment prevented taxation of the receipts in India; the revenue's appeal failed.