Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (7) TMI 1207 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Business nexus, tariff receipts, and reasonable section 14A disallowance shape the tax treatment of multiple income heads. A school contribution was held non-deductible because the assessee failed to show a direct business nexus, while tax recovered from power purchasers was ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Business nexus, tariff receipts, and reasonable section 14A disallowance shape the tax treatment of multiple income heads.

                          A school contribution was held non-deductible because the assessee failed to show a direct business nexus, while tax recovered from power purchasers was treated as part of tariff receipts and taxed as income. For years before rule 8D became applicable, section 14A disallowance had to be made on a reasonable basis, and the Assessing Officer's method was accepted on the facts. Interest on employee loans and margin money deposits was treated as business income. The question whether income-tax recoverable enters book profit under section 115JB was remanded for fresh consideration in light of the earlier order and the retrospective amendment.




                          Issues: (i) whether contribution paid to a school was deductible as expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business; (ii) whether tax recovered from power purchasers was taxable as income in the assessee's hands under the normal provisions; (iii) whether disallowance under section 14A for years prior to the applicability of rule 8D had to be made on a reasonable basis; (iv) whether interest received on employee loans and margin money deposits was assessable as business income; and (v) whether income-tax recoverable was to be included while computing book profit under section 115JB.

                          Issue (i): whether contribution paid to a school was deductible as expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business.

                          Analysis: The deduction depended on a demonstrable nexus between the payment and the assessee's business. The assessee failed to establish any business connection for the contribution made to the school, and the payment could not be treated as having been incurred for business purposes.

                          Conclusion: The disallowance was sustained against the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): whether tax recovered from power purchasers was taxable as income in the assessee's hands under the normal provisions.

                          Analysis: The recovery was treated as part of the tariff receipts and, therefore, formed part of the assessee's income. The earlier decision in the assessee's own case on identical facts was followed.

                          Conclusion: The addition was upheld in favour of the Revenue.

                          Issue (iii): whether disallowance under section 14A for years prior to the applicability of rule 8D had to be made on a reasonable basis.

                          Analysis: Rule 8D was held to be prospective from assessment year 2008-09. For earlier years, the disallowance under section 14A had to be determined on a reasonable basis, and the method adopted by the Assessing Officer was accepted as reasonable on the facts.

                          Conclusion: The disallowance was sustained, and the matter was not restored for fresh computation.

                          Issue (iv): whether interest received on employee loans and margin money deposits was assessable as business income.

                          Analysis: The issue had already been decided in the assessee's own earlier years in its favour, and the same reasoning was followed. The interest had the character of business income rather than income from other sources.

                          Conclusion: The classification as business income was upheld in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (v): whether income-tax recoverable was to be included while computing book profit under section 115JB.

                          Analysis: The issue was remanded for fresh consideration in the light of the earlier order and the retrospective amendment affecting clause (i) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the matter afresh according to law.

                          Conclusion: The issue was sent back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration.

                          Final Conclusion: The cross appeals were disposed of with mixed results, with some additions sustained, some issues decided in favour of the assessee, and one issue remanded for fresh adjudication.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where a payment lacks a proven business nexus, it is not deductible as business expenditure; amounts recovered as part of tariff receipts are taxable as income; and for years before rule 8D, section 14A disallowance must be computed on a reasonable basis.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found