Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, once the transactions between the assessee and its associated enterprise were accepted at arm's length, any further income could still be attributed to the assessee in India on the basis of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The arm's length principle was treated as exhaustive for the relevant transactions. Since the transfer pricing analysis showed that the assessee had been remunerated at arm's length for the functions and risks assumed, no further profits remained to be attributed in India on the PE basis. The decision followed the settled position that where the transfer pricing study adequately captures the functions and risks, separate attribution of additional profits is not warranted.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and no further income was held attributable in India on account of a permanent establishment.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's cross objections were allowed on the core attribution issue, and the revenue's appeals were treated as academic or infructuous to that extent.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an associated enterprise is remunerated at arm's length for the functions and risks undertaken, no further profits can be attributed in India on the same transactions merely because a permanent establishment is alleged to exist.