Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (4) TMI 1351 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows deduction for 'Garden Estate' project under section 80-IB(10) The Tribunal upheld the Assessee's appeal, allowing deduction u/s.80-IB(10) for the project 'Garden Estate' on a proportionate basis, following precedents ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal allows deduction for 'Garden Estate' project under section 80-IB(10)

                          The Tribunal upheld the Assessee's appeal, allowing deduction u/s.80-IB(10) for the project 'Garden Estate' on a proportionate basis, following precedents favoring the Assessee. It found no violation of eligibility conditions under section 80-IB(10) for the housing project, rejecting the Revenue's argument against proportionate deduction. The Tribunal referred the matter back to the CIT(A) to reconsider the impact of Finance Act, 2009 amendments on project eligibility, emphasizing compliance with all qualifying conditions for deductions under the Income Tax Act.




                          Issues:

                          1. Allowance of deduction u/s.80-IB(10) on a proportionate basis.
                          2. Interpretation of eligibility conditions under section 80-IB(10) for a housing project.
                          3. Impact of amendments to section 80-IB(10) by Finance Act, 2009 on project eligibility.

                          Issue 1: Allowance of deduction u/s.80-IB(10) on a proportionate basis

                          The appeal by the Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision partly allowing the Assessee's appeal contesting its assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-11. The key matter was the allowance of deduction u/s.80-IB(10) on the project 'Garden Estate' on a proportionate basis. The Tribunal noted that the issue was covered in the Assessee's favor by previous tribunal decisions for subsequent years, and the hearing was closed based on this understanding.

                          Issue 2: Interpretation of eligibility conditions under section 80-IB(10) for a housing project

                          The housing project 'Garden Estate' faced scrutiny due to the conversion of 18 1 BHK flats into 9 duplex flats, exceeding the 1000 sq. ft. limit, potentially disqualifying it for deduction u/s.80-IB(10). The CIT(A) allowed a proportionate deduction excluding the area of the duplex flats. The Tribunal, based on factual examination, found no violation of section 80-IB(10)(c) for the project, allowing deduction on the entire profits. The Revenue's appeal contested this decision citing legal precedents emphasizing that a project is either eligible as a whole or not, disallowing proportionate deduction.

                          Issue 3: Impact of amendments to section 80-IB(10) by Finance Act, 2009 on project eligibility

                          The Tribunal highlighted amendments to section 80-IB(10) by Finance Act, 2009, introducing conditions regarding allotment of residential units in housing projects. The new clauses (e) and (f) set conditions for project eligibility concerning allotment, aiming to prevent circumvention of area restrictions. In the case at hand, the conversion of flats into duplex units triggered these new conditions, potentially disqualifying the project for deduction. The Tribunal noted a failure to address this issue earlier and decided to refer the matter back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration in light of the amended law, emphasizing the need for compliance with all qualifying conditions for project eligibility.

                          In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues of deduction allowance under section 80-IB(10), interpretation of eligibility conditions for housing projects, and the impact of legislative amendments on project eligibility. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to all qualifying conditions for claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act, ensuring accurate determination of tax liability.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found