Court grants waiver/stay under Income Tax Act, emphasizes reasoned orders, directs review, sets timeline.

The court granted the petitioner a waiver/stay of recovery proceedings under Section 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act, allowing for the refund of the transferred amount pending appeal. Emphasizing the importance of reasoned orders, the court set aside the previous decision and directed a thorough review of the petitioner's application by the Principal CIT. The court underscored adherence to the Trinity Test for waiver/stay requests and instructed the third respondent to dispose of the Section 220 (6) application within thirty days, ensuring the petitioner's right to be heard before any decision is made.

---

---

Issues:
1. Stay of recovery proceedings pending appeal under Section 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Refund of transferred amount pending appeal.
3. Compliance with the Trinity Test for waiver/stay of recovery proceedings.
4. Disposal of application under Section 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act by the third respondent.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner had received an assessment order for the assessment year 2017-2018 and filed a statutory appeal under Section 246 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, along with an application to stay the recovery of the amount under Section 220 (6) of the Act. However, both the appeal and application were pending without disposal by the Appellate Commissioner or the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The petitioner sought a refund of the transferred amount of Rs.74,66,660.44 pending appeal, which was transferred to the Income Tax Department under Section 226 (3) of the Act. The court noted that the petitioner was entitled to waiver/stay of the recovery proceedings as per Section 220 (6) of the Act.

2. Referring to the judgment in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs LG Electronics India Private Limited, the court emphasized the need for reasoned orders in such matters. The court set aside the previous order and directed that the petitioner's application be heard by the Principal CIT on merits without any curtailment of discretion. The court highlighted the importance of addressing the central issues in the pending appeal and ensuring that orders are reasoned and sustainable in law.

3. The court also referenced the Trinity Test established in Kannammal Vs Income Tax Officer, emphasizing the need to follow this test in assessing waiver/stay requests. Additionally, the court mentioned a previous order in Queen Agencies Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, which reiterated the importance of adhering to established legal principles in such cases.

4. Finally, the court directed the third respondent to dispose of the application filed under Section 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act within thirty days, ensuring that the petitioner is heard before any decision is made. The court specified that any recovery proceedings pending the disposal of the appeal would be subject to the orders passed by the third respondent. Additionally, the court highlighted the discretion of the second respondent to consider the petitioner's tax payments on demonetized currency and make appropriate decisions in line with legal precedents.

---