We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Court challenges constitutional validity of tax law amendments; interim order granted pending further proceedings. The court issued notice to the respondents challenging the constitutional validity and vires of Explanation in Notification No.20/2021 and Notification ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court challenges constitutional validity of tax law amendments; interim order granted pending further proceedings.
The court issued notice to the respondents challenging the constitutional validity and vires of Explanation in Notification No.20/2021 and Notification No.38/2021 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner questioned the applicability of sections 148 and 148A of the Income Tax Act post insertion by Finance Act 2021. An ad-interim order was granted in favor of the petitioner until the returnable date, with further proceedings tagged with another case.
Issues: Challenge to the constitutional validity and vires of Explanation in Notification No.20/2021 and Notification No.38/2021 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Questioning the applicability of sections 148 and 148A of the Income Tax Act post insertion by Finance Act 2021.
Analysis: The petitioner has filed a petition challenging the constitutional validity and vires of the Explanation contained in Notification No.20/2021 and Notification No.38/2021, which extend the time limit for issuance of Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner also challenges a consequential notice seeking to reopen the Income Tax Assessment for the assessment year 2015-2016. Additionally, the petitioner questions the applicability of the new provisions inserted by the Finance Act 2021, namely sections 148 and 148A of the Income Tax Act.
The petitioner argues that the Finance Act 2021 has substituted the provision of section 147 with effect from 01.04.2021, and the time limit for issuing the notice under section 148 has been extended by the aforementioned notifications. The petitioner contends that having two parallel provisions applicable simultaneously is not permissible. The validity of the notice and Notification No.20 of 2021 issued by the CBDT is challenged, citing the purported exercise of powers conferred by section 3(1) of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
During the hearing, the advocate for the petitioner argued that even the Revenue Authorities could not have extended the operation of the repealed provision of section 148 beyond 31.03.2021 under the guise of a clarificatory explanation in the notifications. Consequently, the Court issued notice to the respondents, returnable on 22.11.2021, with directions for completion of pleadings. An ad-interim order was granted in favor of the petitioner until the returnable date. The case was also tagged with Special Civil Applications No.12621 of 2021 for further proceedings.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.