Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from sub-licensing of live transmission rights were taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Singapore DTAA.
Analysis: The agreements specifically apportioned consideration between live and non-live transmissions, and the dispute concerned only the live transmission component. Royalty under Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) requires a transfer of rights in a copyright or other specified property. Referring to the Copyright Act, the Court held that live telecast or live broadcast is not a copyrightable work, as copyright subsists in defined works such as literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works, cinematograph films and sound recordings, not in a live broadcast as such. The Court further relied on the distinction between copyright and broadcasting right and held that live coverage does not fall within the royalty definition. Explanation 6, dealing with process and transmission by satellite, was held inapplicable on the facts because the assessee itself was not the transmitter.
Conclusion: The live transmission receipts were not chargeable as royalty and were not taxable on that basis.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the addition treating the live transmission receipts as royalty was deleted.