Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for import of a vehicle covered by the DGFT policy circular, the type approval certificate had to be issued only by an accredited agency in the country of origin or whether a certificate from any signatory country to the 1958 Agreement was sufficient.
Analysis: The relevant circular clarified that for vehicles falling within the European Union category, a certificate from the country of origin need not be insisted upon, and the only requirement was that the type approval certificate be issued by a testing agency notified under the policy circular and come from a signatory country to the 1958 Agreement under WP29. The goods were shipped from the United Kingdom, and the certificate was issued by the Vehicle Certification Agency, U.K., which is a signatory country. The insistence on a certificate from Japan merely because Japan was the country of origin was contrary to the circular.
Conclusion: The Revenue's objection was untenable, the impugned order was set aside, and the import was held to be in compliance with the policy circular.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing policy circular permits a type approval certificate from any signatory country to the 1958 Agreement, a certificate need not originate from the country of origin merely because the vehicle was manufactured there.