Violation of Natural Justice Principles in Income Tax Assessment Reopening

The High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in the reopening of assessment under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2018-2019. The appellant was not provided with complete information necessary to respond effectively, leading to a lack of fair opportunity. The Court directed the appellant to file objections with supporting documents within two weeks and instructed the assessing officer to consider the response and provide a personal hearing before passing fresh orders under Section 148A(d). The notice issued under Section 148 of the Act was deemed unenforceable until compliance with the Court's directives, ensuring due process.

---

---

Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice in reopening assessment under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2018-2019.

Detailed Analysis:

The appeal was filed challenging an order directing the filing of an affidavit-in-opposition without granting an interim order in favor of the appellant/assessee. The appellant contested a notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act dated 12.03.2022, alleging a violation of natural justice principles. The assessing officer initiated proceedings under the amended Act post the conclusion of scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act. The appellant responded with relevant details, asserting that no income had escaped assessment for the relevant year. However, the order dated 30.03.2022 did not explicitly state the reasons for reopening beyond the reply provided by the assessee.

The High Court observed that the appellant was not provided with full information forming the basis for the reopening proceedings, which included references to a search action and recorded statements. The lack of complete information hindered the appellant's ability to effectively respond, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. Consequently, the Court directed the appellant to file objections within two weeks of receiving the order, enclosing all supporting documents. The assessing officer was instructed to consider the reply, documents, and provide a personal hearing to the appellant before passing fresh orders under Section 148A(d) of the Act.

The Court ruled that the order dated 30.03.2022 under Clause (d) of Section 148A would serve as the basis for reopening, emphasizing the need for the appellant to have a fair opportunity to present their case. The notice issued under Section 148 of the Act dated 06.04.2022 was deemed unenforceable until compliance with the Court's directions. Subsequently, both the appeal and the writ petition were disposed of, along with any connected applications, ensuring the appellant's rights were protected and due process was followed throughout the proceedings.

---