Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable on arrears of excise licence fee for the period during which recovery remained stayed by an interim order, after the writ petition was dismissed.
Analysis: The liability to pay licence fee under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 remained intact notwithstanding the interim stay; the stay only suspended recovery and did not nullify the demand. Section 38A of the Act provides for interest on arrears of excise revenue. Once the writ proceedings came to an end, the interim order merged in the final result, and the party who had benefited from the stay could not retain the advantage of withholding payment without compensating the State. The principles of restitution and actus curiae neminem gravabit required the parties to be restored to the position they would have occupied had the interim protection not been granted.
Conclusion: The respondent was liable to pay interest on the withheld excise licence fee for the stay period. The High Court's view that no interest was payable because of the interim order was erroneous.
Ratio Decidendi: An interim stay only suspends enforcement and, upon dismissal of the substantive proceedings, the beneficiary of the stay must restore the other side to the position it would have occupied but for the interim order, including payment of statutory interest on the withheld amount.