TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessees' appeals partly allowed on Long Term Capital Loss assessment for agricultural land sale. Valuation methods considered, FMV determined.</h1> <h3>Smt. Padmaben N. Patel, Smt. Vinaben Pravinbhai Patel Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Ward-2 (2) (5), Surat.</h3> Smt. Padmaben N. Patel, Smt. Vinaben Pravinbhai Patel Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Ward-2 (2) (5), Surat. - TMI Issues:Assessment of Long Term Capital Loss on sale of agricultural land - Fair Market Value determination as on 01.04.1981 - Validity of Valuation methods - Reference to District Valuation Officer - Compliance with Section 55A of the Act.Analysis:Issue 1: Assessment of Long Term Capital Loss on sale of agricultural landThe appeals by the assessees were against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessees claimed Long Term Capital Loss on the sale of agricultural land. The Assessing Officer collected information from the Sub-Registrar's office and calculated Long Term Capital Gain based on that information. The assessees contended that the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the land as on 01.04.1981 should be determined based on a Valuation report prepared by a Government approved registered valuer using the Reverse Index Method.Issue 2: Fair Market Value determination as on 01.04.1981The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) adopted the Fair Market Value of the land as on 01.04.1981 based on the report of the District Valuation Officer (DVO), granting partial relief to the assessees. The assessees raised grounds of appeal challenging the rejection of the Valuation report prepared by the registered valuer and the adoption of the FMV by the CIT(A) as determined by the DVO. The Tribunal considered the valuation methods and the variation in rates provided by different authorities.Issue 3: Validity of Valuation methods and Compliance with Section 55A of the ActThe Tribunal referred to a previous case where it was held that if the value claimed by the assessee is in accordance with the estimate made by the Registered Valuer, then a reference to the DVO can be made if the AO believes the value claimed is less than the FMV as on 01.04.1981. The Tribunal considered the rates provided by the Government Registered Valuer, DVO, and CIT(A) and arrived at an average rate for the FMV. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to work out the Long Term Capital Gain based on the average FMV rate.In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessees based on the valuation methods and the determination of Fair Market Value as on 01.04.1981. The orders were announced in a Virtual Court hearing on 13th January 2021.
TaxTMI 