TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court modifies order in revenue appeal, upholds show cause notice, emphasizes natural justice principles</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of CGST, Kolkata Audit-I, Commissionerate Versus M/s. Saumya Agrotech Private Limited & Ors.</h3> The Commissioner of CGST, Kolkata Audit-I, Commissionerate Versus M/s. Saumya Agrotech Private Limited & Ors. - 2022 (66) G.S.T.L. 387 (Cal.) , [2022] 107 ... Issues:Violation of principles of natural justice in issuing show cause notice without pre-consultation. Quashing of show cause notice and demand letter. Applicability of circulars for pre-consultation in cases of demands over Rs.50,00,000. Modification of the order to protect interests of both assessee and revenue. Submission of written objections by respondent-writ petitioner within 15 days. Consideration of documents produced during personal hearing. Disposal of connected application.Analysis:The High Court of Calcutta heard an intra-Court appeal filed by the revenue challenging an order passed in WPA 17451 of 2021. The respondent-petitioner had challenged a show cause notice-cum-demand issued by the CGST, Kolkata Audit-I, citing a serious violation of natural justice principles due to lack of pre-show cause notice consultation. The respondent-petitioner had requested time to produce necessary details and documents, but the show cause notice was issued without responding to this request. The Single Bench quashed the show cause notice but allowed the department to issue a fresh notice. Pre-consultation is deemed mandatory for demands exceeding Rs.50,00,000, as per circulars issued by the department to facilitate better understanding of cases and potentially prevent further proceedings.The Court acknowledged the lack of sufficient time for the respondent-writ petitioner to react and produce necessary documents before the authority for pre-show cause notice consultation, agreeing that there was a violation of natural justice principles. However, the Court deemed quashing the show cause notice unnecessary in this case. The appeal was partly allowed, setting aside the order quashing the show cause notice and treating its contents as additional information to the audit observation. The assessing officer was directed to schedule a personal hearing with the respondent assessee, during which the case would be discussed, and proceedings would continue in accordance with the law. No coercive action was to be taken against the respondent-writ petitioner until the personal hearing was completed.The respondent-writ petitioner was instructed to submit their written objections to the audit observation and show cause notice within 15 days. The assessing officer was required to consider any documents presented during the personal hearing and proceed based on merits and the law within 10 days of the hearing's conclusion. The Court clarified that the respondent-assessee could not raise the issue of limitation due to the partial allowance of the appeal by the appellant department. Consequently, the connected application was disposed of as per the Court's directives.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
