Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the service tax demand raised on sales commission received for arranging vehicle loans.
Analysis: The appellants relied on an earlier Bench ruling holding that the benefit of Notification No. 25/2004-C.E. was available in an identical matter. On a prima facie examination of the submissions and the notification, the Bench found substance in the appellants' contention and considered the cited stay order applicable to the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.