Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused were rightly discharged and the criminal proceedings quashed on the basis of the one time settlement, despite allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving cheating, forgery, fabricated documents and diversion of bank funds.
Analysis: The allegation was not of a mere borrower-bank dispute but of a coordinated scheme in which forged purchase orders, bills and lorry receipts were used to procure credit facilities and divert funds. The materials in the charge-sheet disclosed multiple instances of alleged fabrication and misuse of banking facilities, showing a prima facie case of offences under the penal law. The one time settlement resolved only the civil liability to the bank and could not erase criminal liability where the allegations disclosed serious economic wrongdoing affecting society. The power to quash or discharge on settlement is confined to cases having predominantly civil flavour, and not to cases involving serious fraud and forgery with wider public consequences.
Conclusion: The discharge and the refusal to interfere were unsustainable. The accused were not entitled to quashing or discharge on the basis of the settlement, and the matter was directed to proceed to trial.