TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court allows appeal, condones 108-day delay; dismisses for lack of merit. No merit due to premature demand notice.</h1> The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal, condoning a delay of 108 days. The court did not delve into the merits of the case as the demand notice ... GTA service – Apex court in similar case held that users of service are not liable to pay Service tax and the service provider has to pay the same - held that the provisions of Rule 2(d)(1)(xvii) (sic) are ultra vires of Finance Act & department is directed to refund the Service tax collected from the assessees – revenue’s appeal is dismissed The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal, condoning a delay of 108 days. The court did not delve into the merits of the case as the demand notice was served before the effective date of the relevant Act. The appeal was dismissed as it lacked merit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
