Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1996 (2) TMI 596 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Chance recovery and strict NDPS bail rules limited relief where Section 50 and detention objections failed. In a chance-recovery narcotics case, Section 50 of the NDPS Act was treated as inapplicable where contraband was found in a briefcase during ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Chance recovery and strict NDPS bail rules limited relief where Section 50 and detention objections failed.

                          In a chance-recovery narcotics case, Section 50 of the NDPS Act was treated as inapplicable where contraband was found in a briefcase during suspicion-based airport checking and no personal search after discovery was shown; the alleged Section 50 defect therefore did not support bail. Alleged delay in sending samples and discrepancies in weight were regarded as trial issues, not grounds for bail, because the court would not conduct a mini trial at that stage. The 24-hour detention complaint failed because time was computed from formal arrest, not earlier questioning. Given the gravity of the offence and the restrictive Section 37 bail regime, release was declined.




                          Issues: (i) Whether non-compliance with Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 entitled the petitioner to bail in a case of chance recovery of narcotic drugs; (ii) Whether alleged delay and discrepancies in investigation could be relied on at the bail stage; (iii) Whether the petitioner was illegally detained for more than 24 hours in violation of Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India; (iv) Whether bail should be granted having regard to the gravity of the offence and Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

                          Issue (i): Whether non-compliance with Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 entitled the petitioner to bail in a case of chance recovery of narcotic drugs.

                          Analysis: The recovery was from a briefcase during suspicion-based checking at the airport and was treated as a chance recovery. In such a situation, the requirement of offering the search option contemplated by Section 50 does not arise unless the search is of the person after narcotic drugs have already been found in the relevant context. The earlier Supreme Court authorities were read as turning on their own facts, and the case was distinguished on the footing that no personal search after discovery of contraband was shown.

                          Conclusion: The alleged violation of Section 50 was not made out and did not justify bail.

                          Issue (ii): Whether alleged delay and discrepancies in investigation could be relied on at the bail stage.

                          Analysis: The alleged delay in sending samples and the alleged discrepancy in weight were held to be matters for trial. The bail court was not required to conduct a mini trial, and the prosecution was entitled to explain those matters during evidence.

                          Conclusion: These objections were premature and afforded no ground for bail.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the petitioner was illegally detained for more than 24 hours in violation of Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India.

                          Analysis: The relevant time for computing the 24-hour period was taken from formal arrest, not from the earlier stage of questioning or custody for enquiry. On the record, the petitioner was formally arrested and produced before the Magistrate on the same day. Custody and arrest were treated as distinct concepts, and no illegal detention was found.

                          Conclusion: No violation of Section 57 or Article 22 was established.

                          Issue (iv): Whether bail should be granted having regard to the gravity of the offence and Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

                          Analysis: The confession recorded by the Customs Officer, the serious nature of the alleged offence, the lapse of time after arrest, and the restrictive bail regime under Section 37 weighed against release. Medical treatment could be arranged in custody and did not by itself justify bail.

                          Conclusion: Bail was not warranted.

                          Final Conclusion: The petition failed on all material grounds and the Court declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, while directing expedition of the trial.

                          Ratio Decidendi: In a chance recovery case, Section 50 does not apply unless a personal search after discovery of contraband is involved, and the 24-hour rule is computed from formal arrest rather than prior questioning or custody for enquiry.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found