Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on parts and components used in machines installed in the factory could be denied on the ground that the machines were immovable property and on a ground not set out in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The notice required the duty-paying documents to stand in the appellants' name, and the record showed that the parts and components were received with such documents and were used in the appellants' factory in machines employed for manufacture of final products. Rule 57-AA of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 treated capital goods as specified items used in the factory of the manufacturer of final products. The denial based on the machines being immovable property was not the basis of the notice and was therefore outside its scope.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible to the appellants, and denial on the stated grounds was not sustainable.