Court admits winding-up petition, appoints provisional liquidator, restrains asset disposal, and orders publication.

The Court admitted the petition for winding-up under the Companies Act, 1956, finding the respondent's dispute regarding payment obligation not genuine. The Official Liquidator was appointed as the provisional liquidator to safeguard the company's assets. The respondent was restrained from disposing of assets, and an advertisement about the petition's admission was ordered to be published. The Court emphasized the seriousness of the matter and scheduled a hearing for further legal proceedings to address the financial dispute effectively.

---

---

Issues:
Petition for winding-up under Companies Act, 1956 based on outstanding dues - Dispute regarding payment obligation and genuineness - Appointment of provisional liquidator - Restraining respondent from disposing of assets - Publication of advertisement.

Analysis:
The petitioner filed a petition under sections 433 and 434 read with section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking the winding-up of the respondent company due to outstanding dues. The petitioner, engaged in manufacturing and dealing in products, supplied goods to the respondent based on assurances of payment by the company's directors. Despite initial payments, the respondent failed to clear the outstanding amount, leading to the issuance of a statutory notice which remained unanswered. The respondent's cheques for settlement were dishonored, indicating financial strain.

The respondent, through its advocate, contended that it is a going concern engaged in trading in building materials with a stable financial scenario, disputing the petitioner's claim of supplying goods. The respondent argued that the invoices were issued for financing purposes only and not for actual sales, denying any obligation to pay the alleged dues. The respondent maintained that the dispute raised was genuine and the petition should be dismissed.

After considering arguments and reviewing the evidence, the Court found that the respondent's dispute was an afterthought and not genuine. The Court concluded that the respondent failed to pay its debts, rendering it unable to pay as per the Companies Act. Consequently, the petition was admitted, and the Official Liquidator was appointed as the provisional liquidator to take custody of the company's assets. The respondent was restrained from disposing of its properties, and an advertisement about the petition's admission was directed to be published in specified newspapers. The hearing was scheduled for a later date, emphasizing the seriousness of the matter and the need for legal proceedings to address the financial dispute effectively.

---