Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court denies immediate relief in writ petition for final assessment, awaits appeal process</h1> <h3>M/s. Sai Exports, Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Mahesh Kumar Versus. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (GR. 3),</h3> M/s. Sai Exports, Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Mahesh Kumar Versus. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (GR. 3), - TMI Issues:Mandamus for final assessment of bills of entry; Challenge to provisional assessment; Contemplation of appeal by revenue; Disposal of writ petition without expressing view on merits.Analysis:The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the respondent to carry out the final assessment for various bills of entry filed since May 2015. The bills were provisionally assessed with bank guarantees, but final orders were not passed despite a favorable decision by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal on March 1, 2018. The petitioner's grievance was the delay in passing final orders despite the Tribunal's decision in their favor.The respondent, on the other hand, contended that the issue was not final as they were considering appealing the Tribunal's decision. The revenue received notice of the decision on September 25, 2018, and was within the time limit to file an appeal. The respondent argued that they could only pass final orders on the bills of entry once the appeal process was concluded.The Court acknowledged the petitioner's request for final orders based on the Tribunal's decision but noted that the respondent's intention to appeal meant they could not direct immediate action based on the Tribunal's order. The Court highlighted that the respondent had the right to challenge the Tribunal's decision in the appropriate forum. Therefore, without delving into the merits of the claims, the Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to pursue remedies once the statutory appeal period had lapsed. No costs were awarded in the judgment.