TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Technical Handling Income Not Taxable Under India-Netherlands DTAA</h1> <h3>DCIT, Circle 2 (1) (2), International Taxation, New Delhi Versus KLM Royal Dutch Airlines</h3> DCIT, Circle 2 (1) (2), International Taxation, New Delhi Versus KLM Royal Dutch Airlines - TMI Issues:- Challenge to the order of CIT (A) deleting the addition made by AO treating entire income of assessee from technical handling as taxable in India.- Interpretation of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Netherlands.- Application of precedent set by previous judgments of ITAT and Delhi High Court.Analysis:1. The appeals by the Revenue challenged the CIT (A) order deleting the addition made by the AO regarding the taxation of the entire income of the assessee from technical handling in India.2. The assessee, a Foreign Company from Netherlands, operated in India through a branch office approved by the Reserve Bank of India. The assessee claimed exemption from taxation in India under Section 90 of the Income-tax Act and Article 8 of the DTAA between India and Netherlands.3. The AO assessed the income of the assessee as taxable in India, disregarding the submissions and supporting agreements provided by the assessee. The CIT (A) noted that the issue was previously decided in favor of the assessee by ITAT and Delhi High Court in earlier years.4. The ITAT referred to the Delhi High Court's decision for assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09, which elaborately dealt with whether the profits from providing technical services are covered under the DTAA between India and Germany and India and Netherlands.5. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no infirmity in the ITAT's orders. Subsequently, for assessment years 2009-10 to 2012-13, the High Court continued to decide the issue in favor of the assessee.6. Following the precedent set by the High Court and ITAT judgments, the ITAT upheld the CIT (A) order for both assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue.7. The ITAT pronounced the order on June 1, 2022, applying the decision mutatis mutandis to both assessment years.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, the arguments presented, the application of legal provisions, and the reliance on precedent to arrive at the final decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
