1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court orders refund with interest in real estate case, sets aside insolvency proceedings</h1> The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, an allottee in a real estate project, ordering Respondent No.3 to refund the appellant with 10.7% ... Refund of amount paid in a real estate project - HELD THAT:- The matter is being disposed of today as it is clear that the appellant is an allottee in the real estate project of the Respondent No.3. As an allottee, it has either a right to get possession of the flat or to claim refund. It has been argued before us that the appellant has been offered possession but has declined. In this event, it is clear that the appellant is entitled to refund of monies that it has paid. This refund will be made by Respondent No.3 within a period of four weeks from today with 10.7% interest - It is made clear that this order is not to be treated as a precedent. Appeal disposed off. The Supreme Court ordered that the appellant, an allottee in a real estate project, is entitled to a refund from Respondent No.3 with 10.7% interest within four weeks. The order is not a precedent and insolvency proceedings by Respondent No.2 are set aside. The appeal and pending applications are disposed of.