Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2019 (8) TMI 1838 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeal, approves Cenvat credit for commission agent services, sales promotion activities The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit on services rendered by commission agents/stockists. It held that the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal allows appeal, approves Cenvat credit for commission agent services, sales promotion activities

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit on services rendered by commission agents/stockists. It held that the services qualified as 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, including sales promotion activities. The Tribunal ruled that the retrospective application of the amendment clarifying sales promotion activities supported the assessee's position. Additionally, the demand was found to be time-barred, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee with consequential relief.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on services rendered by commission agents/stockists.
                          2. Interpretation of 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
                          3. Applicability of CBEC Circular and judicial precedents.
                          4. Retrospective application of the amendment in Rule 2(l) of Credit Rules.
                          5. Time-bar and penalty imposition.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on services rendered by commission agents/stockists:
                          The assessee, engaged in manufacturing coal tar pitch and allied products, availed Cenvat credit for services rendered by Consignment Stockists under agreements aimed at promoting sales. The Ld. Commissioner disallowed the credit, asserting that these services did not qualify as 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, leading to a demand for recovery of Rs. 3,99,07,973/- with interest and penalty.

                          2. Interpretation of 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:
                          The assessee contended that the services provided by the Consignment Stockists included sales promotion activities, which fall within the definition of 'input services'. The agreement clauses highlighted responsibilities such as promoting sales, providing warehouse facilities, and informing about demand prospects, which align with sales promotion activities.

                          3. Applicability of CBEC Circular and judicial precedents:
                          The assessee referred to CBEC Circular 943/04/2011-CX dated 29.04.2011, which clarified that credit is admissible for commission-based sale services. The Punjab & Haryana High Court's decision in CCE, Ludhiana v. Ambika Overseas supported this view. The Ld. Commissioner had relied on the Gujarat High Court's decision in CCE, Ahmedabad v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd., which the assessee argued was factually distinct and inapplicable to their case.

                          4. Retrospective application of the amendment in Rule 2(l) of Credit Rules:
                          The assessee argued that the amendment to Rule 2(l) via Notification No. 02/2016-CE dated 03.02.2016, which clarified that sales promotion includes commission-based sales, should apply retrospectively. The Tribunal's decision in Essar Steel India Ltd. supported this retrospective application, aligning with the principle that explanatory amendments clarifying existing provisions apply to past periods.

                          5. Time-bar and penalty imposition:
                          The assessee contested the demand on grounds of time-bar, stating that the credit was disclosed in ER-1 returns, and the absence of a specific column for the nature of input services did not imply mala fide intent. The Tribunal in UltraTech Cement Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur-II held that non-disclosure of details not required by statutory provisions does not constitute suppression or concealment, thus supporting the assessee's position against the extended period of limitation and penalty imposition.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal found that the services provided by the Consignment Stockists included sales promotion activities, qualifying as 'input services' under Rule 2(l). The reliance on the Gujarat High Court's decision was deemed incorrect due to factual distinctions. The amendment to Rule 2(l) was held to apply retrospectively, supporting the assessee's eligibility for credit. The demand was also time-barred, given the absence of suppression. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief as per law.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found