Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Bombardier Transportation India Ltd. constituted the assessee's fixed place permanent establishment in India and whether the income from the DMRC contracts could be attributed to such alleged permanent establishment.
Analysis: The assessment and first appellate orders had followed the earlier year's findings on the same controversy. On comparison of facts, the Tribunal held that the earlier reasoning proceeded on erroneous appreciation of the contract facts and the role of the alleged seconded employee. The Tribunal found that the assessee had no place of business in India through BTIN from which it could have carried on business, and that the factual basis for treating BTIN as a permanent establishment was not established on the record for the year under appeal. Following the coordinate bench decision on the same issue and finding factual parity, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's challenge.
Conclusion: BTIN was not treated as the assessee's fixed place permanent establishment in India for the relevant contracts, and the profit attribution made by the Revenue was deleted. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.