Project import spares qualify for concessional assessment when linked to contract obligations and imported within the permitted limit.

Imported spares were held eligible for concessional assessment under Heading 98.01 as project imports where the project was still incomplete, the spares were imported within the permissible 10% limit of project value, and they were referable to the contractual obligation to support trial operation and cure defects. The provision was construed liberally to cover spares, raw materials and consumables essential for maintenance, and there was no rule that all project-import items had to arrive with the initial consignment. The denial of benefit was found unsupported by proper consideration of the project contract and the authorities relied on, rendering the demand unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported spares were entitled to concessional assessment under Heading 98.01 as project imports, including whether spares imported after the initial machinery import and within the 10% limit of project value could be covered by the registered project contract.

Analysis: The contract and project records showed that the project had not been completed when the spares were imported, and there was no rule requiring all items to be imported only with the initial consignment. The spares were within the permissible 10% limit and were referable to the contractual obligation to ensure successful trial operation and remedy defects. Heading 98.01 specifically contemplates spares, raw materials and consumables essential for maintenance, and it was to be construed liberally in the context of project imports. The denial of benefit was also unsupported by proper consideration of the project contract and the case law relied upon.

Conclusion: The spares were eligible for concessional assessment under Heading 98.01, and the demand confirmed against the appellant was unsustainable.

---