Appeal dismissed for non-appearance, remanded for fair consideration.

The appeal was rejected due to the assessee's non-appearance, resulting in an ex-parte order by the CIT(A). The dismissal was upheld based on non-prosecution, following precedents. The ITAT found the CIT(A) failed to decide on the appeal's merits as required by law, leading to the issue being remanded for proper consideration. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to allow the assessee a final opportunity for presenting their case and emphasized the importance of fair adjudication. This case underscores the significance of due process and thorough consideration in tax assessments.

---

---

Issues:
1. Ex-parte order by CIT(A) due to non-appearance of assessee.
2. Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution.
3. Failure of CIT(A) to decide appeal on merit.
4. Restoration of issue to CIT(A) for proper adjudication.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed by the assessee against the ex-parte order of CIT(A) for assessment year 2010-11. Despite notice, the assessee did not appear, leading to the decision being based solely on available records and the arguments presented by the Senior DR.

2. The Assessing Officer had made additions to the income of the assessee, which the CIT(A) upheld due to non-prosecution by the assessee. The dismissal was in line with the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and other precedents. The appeal was thus rejected on procedural grounds.

3. The ITAT noted that the CIT(A) had failed to decide the appeal on its merits, as required by law. Section 250(6) mandates that the order disposing of the appeal should include points for determination, decision, and reasons. Since the CIT(A) did not fulfill this requirement, the ITAT deemed it necessary to send the issue back to the CIT(A) for proper consideration.

4. In the interest of justice, the ITAT directed the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with one last opportunity to present its case and make a decision based on facts and law. The assessee was instructed to appear before the CIT(A) for this purpose, with a warning that failure to do so may result in appropriate action by the CIT(A). The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair and thorough adjudication of the matter.

This judgment highlights the importance of due process in tax assessments and the obligation of appellate authorities to decide appeals on both procedural and substantive grounds. The ITAT's decision to remand the issue to the CIT(A) underscores the significance of a fair hearing and proper consideration of all aspects of a case before reaching a final decision.

---