Tribunal Allows Assessee's Appeal on ESI/PF Disallowance

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of ESI/PF contribution under sec. 36(va) and sec. 43B was not sustainable. The Tribunal considered legislative amendments and CBDT clarifications, noting that the Finance Act, 2021 proposed employers' contribution disallowance under sec. 43B, not employees' contribution under sec. 36(va). Despite the Revenue's reliance on case laws, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the amendments applied prospectively from 1.4.2021. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and ordered the deletion of the impugned disallowance of Rs. 2,11,750.

---

---

Issues:
1. Deductibility of employees' share payment to PF & ESI authority under sec. 36(1)(va) and sec. 43B(b).
2. Impact of CBDT Circular no. 22/2015 on sec. 43B disallowance under sec. 36(1)(va).
3. Disallowance of ESI/PF contribution under sec. 36(va) and sec. 43B.

Analysis:
The appeal involved the question of whether the payment/contribution of employees' share to the PF & ESI authority before the due date of filing the return for the year is eligible for deduction under sec. 36(1)(va) read with sec. 43B(b). The assessee argued that the CBDT Circular no. 22/2015 cannot override sec. 43B, thus no disallowance should be made under sec. 36(1)(va). The Tribunal considered the legislative amendments brought by the Finance Act, 2021, and the CBDT's Memorandum of Explanation clarifying the applicability of these amendments from 1.4.2021. It was noted that the amendments proposed employers' contribution disallowance under sec. 43B instead of employees' contribution under sec. 36(va). The Tribunal held that the impugned disallowance of ESI/PF contribution was not sustainable in light of these developments, even though the Revenue's case was supported by various case laws.

The Tribunal specifically addressed the issue of ESI/PF disallowance amounting to Rs. 2,11,750. Both the assessee and the Revenue contended that the payment was made before the due date of filing the return under sec. 139(1) but after the due date prescribed in the respective statutes. The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative amendments and the CBDT's clarification applied prospectively from 1.4.2021. Despite the Revenue's reliance on case laws, the Tribunal held that the impugned disallowance should be deleted. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on these grounds, pronouncing the order in Open Court on 29/06/2021.

---