TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of service tax on royalty payable under the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 was liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged the service tax demand on royalty. The relief sought was opposed by the existence of an earlier Division Bench decision of the same High Court which had already rejected similar challenges. The Court followed that prior decision and found no basis to take a different view in the present matter.
Conclusion: The challenge to the demand of service tax on royalty failed and the writ petition was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
