TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Civil Appeals with Low Tax Impact, Directs Withdrawal under CBDT Circular</h1> <h3>DIRECTOR OF I.T., COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT) 4 Versus M/s MITSUBHISHI CORP., M/s FOX NETWORKS GROUP ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED.</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed several Civil Appeals with a tax effect less than Rs. Two Crores based on a CBDT Circular, including cases like C.A Nos. ... Maintainability of appeal before Supreme court - low tax effect - HELD THAT:- Perused the office report dated 26.02.2020, according to which in following matters the tax effect is less than Rs.Two Crores.In view of CBDT Circular dated 8.8.2019, we see no reason to interfere in aforesaid appeals, which are accordingly dismissed. No costs. Issues:1. Dismissal of appeals with tax effect less than Rs. Two Crores2. Appeals related to Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016Issue 1: Dismissal of appeals with tax effect less than Rs. Two CroresThe Supreme Court, perusing the office report, dismissed several Civil Appeals where the tax effect was less than Rs. Two Crores. The appeals included various cases such as C.A Nos. 1259/2016, 1276/2016, 1290/2016, and others. The dismissal was based on the CBDT Circular dated 8.8.2019, with the court finding no reason to interfere in these matters. The judgment stated that the appeals were accordingly dismissed, and no costs were imposed.Issue 2: Appeals related to Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016In specific cases like Civil Appeal Nos. 1373/2016, 1376/2016, 1289/2016, and others, it was noted that the concerned assesses had availed the benefit of the Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016. Consequently, these Civil Appeals were required to be withdrawn. The Department had communicated this to the Supreme Court Registry. The judgment directed these appeals to be placed with the Department's intimation on the next hearing date, with prior notice to the other party. Additionally, other matters were scheduled for final disposal on 6.3.2020, while the Registry was instructed to review all cases and prepare an office report detailing the tax effect for each matter.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
