Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the subsequent amendment permitting import of the specified plastic wastes for SEZ units, the petitioners could be allowed to use the imported raw materials that had been kept unused under earlier court directions, and whether the undertakings furnished by them could be discharged.
Analysis: The subsequent notification inserted Rule 12(6A) and Rule 12(6B) in the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016, expressly permitting SEZ units and notified EOU units to import the specified wastes. The imported goods in question had remained unused only because of the earlier interim restraint imposed by the Court. Once the policy changed, there was no legal basis to continue the restriction on use of the same goods merely because they had been imported during the period when the earlier regime was in force. The petitioners were therefore entitled to seek permission from the respondent authorities to use the goods and to have the seals removed.
Conclusion: The petitioners were permitted to apply for and obtain permission to use the imported raw materials kept unused pursuant to the earlier directions, and the undertakings furnished before the Court stood discharged upon such permission being granted.