Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on expiry of the statutory period without filing of the charge-sheet, and whether such right could be defeated by later filing of the final report.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 167(2) confers an indefeasible right to bail once the prescribed period for investigation expires without filing of the charge-sheet. That right is enforceable when the accused applies for bail and is prepared to furnish the required bond. The Court relied on the settled line of authority that the application for default bail must be considered forthwith and that the prosecution cannot defeat the accrued right by filing the charge-sheet after the application has been made. The merits of the accusation are irrelevant at this stage, since default bail is granted solely on failure to complete investigation within time.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to default bail, and the orders rejecting their applications were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Once the statutory period for investigation expires without filing of the charge-sheet, and the accused applies for bail and offers to furnish it, the right to default bail becomes enforceable and cannot be defeated by a subsequent filing of the charge-sheet.