Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal against a penalty order under section 271FA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 lies before the Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246A(1)(q) and whether the first appellate order dismissing the appeal as not maintainable was sustainable.
Analysis: Penalty under section 271FA for default in complying with section 285BA(1) falls within Chapter XXI of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 246A(1)(q) is the residuary appellate provision for orders imposing penalty under Chapter XXI and therefore provides the statutory forum of first appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The view that the appeal was not maintainable before that authority was held to be erroneous, and the matter was required to be examined on merits by the proper appellate forum after giving due opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The Commissioner (Appeals) was held to be the correct appellate authority, the dismissal of the appeal as infructuous was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals).