Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 11-AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can be reduced or waived when the duty evaded is paid before issuance of the show-cause notice, and what penalty follows when the statutory conditions are attracted.
Analysis: The substantial question was answered by applying the rule that once the ingredients of section 11-AC are satisfied, the authorities have no discretion to impose a lesser penalty or to exempt penalty. Payment of the evaded duty before issuance of the show-cause notice does not by itself eliminate liability under section 11-AC. The Court further noted that the declaration furnished by the assessee, coupled with the contrary claim of depreciation, amounted to misstatement aimed at evasion, thereby attracting the penal provision. The Court also recorded the statutory consequence that the penalty is equivalent to the evaded duty, with the limited statutory reduction to 25 per cent available only if the duty, interest under section 11-AB, and related requirements are satisfied within the prescribed time.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 11-AC is mandatory once attracted and cannot be reduced or waived merely because the duty was paid before the show-cause notice. The assessee remained liable to penalty equivalent to the evaded duty, subject only to the statutory 25 per cent option on timely compliance.