TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition, Emphasizes Scrutiny of Evidence</h1> <h3>State of Gujarat and Ors. Versus Rama Rana and Ors.</h3> The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside previous judgments and determining enhanced compensation for the claimants at Rs. 20,500 per acre. ... - Issues:1. Determination of compensation for land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2. Evaluation of evidence based on crop yield for compensation calculation.3. Application of appropriate multiplier and deduction for cultivation expenses.4. Calculation of enhanced compensation, solatium, and interest for the claimants.Analysis:Issue 1: Determination of compensation for land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894The case involved the acquisition of 68 hectares 62.5 sq. mts. of land for an irrigation scheme. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation at different rates for dry crop lands, irrigated lands, and waste lands. The Asstt. District Judge later enhanced the compensation uniformly to Rs. 325 per acre for all lands. The High Court upheld this decision, leading to the appeals before the Supreme Court.Issue 2: Evaluation of evidence based on crop yield for compensation calculationIn the absence of sale deeds, the Reference Court relied on oral evidence to determine compensation based on crop yield. Witnesses, including the Sarpanch of the village, provided evidence on the yield of the acquired lands. The court found that the witnesses had exaggerated the yield, leading to an incorrect determination of compensation. The court noted that 50% of the crop value typically goes towards cultivation expenses and that a deduction of 1/3rd was not appropriate.Issue 3: Application of appropriate multiplier and deduction for cultivation expensesThe Supreme Court emphasized the importance of scrutinizing oral evidence and applying a multiplier of 10 years, as settled by previous judgments. It was determined that 50% of the net value should be deducted for cultivation expenses. The court set aside the previous award and upheld the value of the crop at Rs. 2,050 as the average annual income per acre.Issue 4: Calculation of enhanced compensation, solatium, and interest for the claimantsAfter applying the appropriate multiplier and deduction for cultivation expenses, the Supreme Court calculated the enhanced compensation for the claimants at Rs. 20,500 per acre. Additionally, the court awarded solatium at 30% on the enhanced compensation and prescribed interest rates for the period until the compensation is deposited in court.In conclusion, the Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the previous judgments and determining the enhanced compensation for the claimants based on a rigorous evaluation of the evidence and legal principles under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
