Customs classification and re-export process must follow fixed timelines, hearing, and consideration of redemption or re-export rights.

Customs authorities were required to first complete classification of the imported goods within the stipulated time, then decide whether the goods were liable to confiscation or could be redeemed. If the goods were found to be prohibited, the authorities could proceed under the applicable customs process, but the importer had to be given an opportunity to re-export the goods to reduce loss. The authorities were also to act within fixed timelines and give the importer a hearing before passing orders. No unconditional direction for re-export or a detention certificate was granted; instead, the matter was to be decided through the prescribed classification, confiscation and release exercise.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to immediate permission to re-export the imported goods and a detention certificate, and the manner in which the customs authorities were to proceed with classification, confiscation and release.

Analysis: The petition was disposed of by applying the earlier guideline that the proper officer should first complete the initial exercise on classification within the stipulated time, then decide whether the goods were liable to confiscation or could be redeemed. If the goods were found to be prohibited, the authorities could proceed accordingly, but the importer was to be given an option to re-export the goods to mitigate loss. The authorities were also required to act within fixed timelines and afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing orders.

Conclusion: The petitioner did not obtain an unconditional direction to re-export or a detention certificate, but the authorities were directed to complete the exercise within the specified time limits and consider re-export if the goods were held to be prohibited.

---